[OZAPRS] OZAPRS Digest, Vol 62, Issue 26
vk5atn at internode.on.net
Fri Sep 26 10:05:12 EST 2014
On 26/09/2014 6:31 AM, ozaprs-request at aprs.net.au wrote:
> I had a cackle when I read the comment "Hams doing what they want as individuals" as I whole
> heartedly agree. The fact that people are still using the -15 SSID for HF is a case in point. Bob
> took this out of the "RFC" years ago. Still, these are only guidelines anyway and I never used the
> -15 SSID as I had VHF APRS running at the same time. Having two SSID's coming from the same vehicle
> would have been very confusing for anyone tracking us.
With respect, I see things somewhat differently.
Fact is that if Bob changed this practice ( -15 for HF stations ), few
people seemed to have noticed. This is not to in any way play down
Bob's role in 'creating' APRS or his valued ongoing contribution in
further developing and promoting it. However having built and
launched the good ship 'APRS', one's control over it diminishes as other
people come on board and steer it to their own ideas and objectives.
Almost all of the 'guides' for HF APRS operation I gurgled in the last
ten minutes or so still advise the use of -15 SSID. It's a practise I
agree with, and indeed follow in my own HF operation. The use of HF
APRS is so different in many respects in equipment, mode and propagation
that it deserves to be identified clearly as a separate and unique mode
of operation. Using a well established and universally accepted
identifier achieves these objectives instantly.
In the meantime we have talked about this poor guy who is 'breaking the
rules' for several days now. Surely those making the observations and
taking offence at what they see can contact him and offer some advice,
rather than discuss it here. If he isn't a subscriber to this list -
and it would appear that he isn't - this achieves absolutely nothing.
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
More information about the OZAPRS