[OZAPRS] Proposed digi for Mt Nardi
Geoff
geoff-lists at gatwards.org
Wed Aug 11 18:15:21 EST 2010
If it’s a VK2 digi I’d suggest -1, as that is what every other VK2 digipeater has been configured with.
The original idea was that -1 was the primary digi on a site, with -2 and -3 being used If there were more than one digi per site (e.g. 6m/70cm)
Somewhere along the process VK4 standardised on -3 for digis, which is also fine….
Regards,
Geoff VK2XJG
From: ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au [mailto:ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au] On Behalf Of Gordon Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 11 August 2010 5:47 PM
To: 'Australian APRS Users'
Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] Proposed digi for Mt Nardi
Steve,
I would use -3 as thats what most up here use
Regards,
Gordo VK4VP
From: ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au [mailto:ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au] On Behalf Of Steve Sharp
Sent: Wednesday, 11 August 2010 17:17
To: Australian APRS Users
Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] Proposed digi for Mt Nardi
That's what I thought - but when I looked up the aprs.net.au site http://aprs.net.au/general/standard-ssids it gives -1 "Digipeater, or Home Station running a Fill-In Digi" and -3 as "Digipeater".
Not quite enough info for me to differentiate;-)
Steve 2poo (not really Shakespeare is it?;-)
On 11 August 2010 16:41, Ray Wells <vk2tv at exemail.com.au> wrote:
Steve,
SSID -1 is generally used for digi's
Ray vk2tv
On 11/08/10 12:20, Steve Sharp wrote:
G'day Ray - all looking good, one final question should the SSID be VK2RPL-1 or -3?
I'm leaning towards -1, but am happy to be corrected before it is written in and sent on it's way;-)
Steve VK2POO
On 10 August 2010 13:59, Ray Wells <vk2tv at exemail.com.au> wrote:
Steve,
83m is 272 ft, close enough to the 300 I guessed.
800m is a tad higher than what SPLAT! (and Google earth) thinks it is but still close enough, especially given the step sizes available for HAAT and Power.
HAAT - Height Above Average Terrain
Pick 0dB gain and the nearest height and you won't be too far off. It's only a guide.
Ray vk2tv
On 10/08/10 09:27, Steve Sharp wrote:
The tech got back to me with the following:
"Antenna Gain is going to be 3db to start with but then unity when we get around to putting the 2m repeater up there , HAAT not
sure what it means but antenna hight is 83m above ground or 883m above sea level"
Sound about right?
Steve VK2POO
On 10 August 2010 07:48, Ray Wells <vk2tv at exemail.com.au> wrote:
Hi Steve,
More information about the OZAPRS
mailing list