[OZAPRS] Proposed digi for Mt Nardi

[Gordon Taylor]

Steve,

                I would use -3 as thats what most up here use

 

Regards,
Gordo VK4VP

 

From: ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au [mailto:ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au] On Behalf Of Steve Sharp
Sent: Wednesday, 11 August 2010 17:17
To: Australian APRS Users
Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] Proposed digi for Mt Nardi

 

That's what I thought - but when I looked up the aprs.net.au site http://aprs.net.au/general/standard-ssids it gives -1 "Digipeater, or Home Station running a Fill-In Digi" and -3 as "Digipeater".

 

Not quite enough info for me to differentiate;-)

 

Steve 2poo (not really Shakespeare is it?;-)

On 11 August 2010 16:41, Ray Wells <vk2tv at exemail.com.au> wrote:

Steve,

SSID -1 is generally used for digi's

Ray vk2tv 



On 11/08/10 12:20, Steve Sharp wrote: 

G'day Ray - all looking good, one final question should the SSID be VK2RPL-1 or -3?

 

I'm leaning towards -1, but am happy to be corrected before it is written in and sent on it's way;-)

 

Steve VK2POO

On 10 August 2010 13:59, Ray Wells <vk2tv at exemail.com.au> wrote:

Steve,

83m is 272 ft, close enough to the 300 I guessed.

800m is a tad higher than what SPLAT! (and Google earth) thinks it is but still close enough, especially given the step sizes available for HAAT and Power.

HAAT - Height Above Average Terrain

Pick 0dB gain and the nearest height and you won't be too far off. It's only a guide.

Ray vk2tv 



On 10/08/10 09:27, Steve Sharp wrote: 

The tech got back to me with the following:

 

"Antenna Gain is going to be 3db to start with but then unity when we get around to putting the 2m repeater up there ,  HAAT not 
sure what it means but antenna hight is 83m above ground or 883m above sea level"

 

Sound about right?

 

Steve VK2POO

On 10 August 2010 07:48, Ray Wells <vk2tv at exemail.com.au> wrote:

Hi Steve,