[OZAPRS] European v USnewparadigmand pathlimiting +confusion....

[Robert Bruninga]

> Roaming mobiles would use WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2 or whatever.
Mobiles not  
> expecting to cross zone boundaries would use ZONE1-1,ZONE2-2
thus  
> eliminating interzone QRM.

Again, 2 hops from any mobile is not going to hurt anyone, so
there is no reason to encourage (and confuse) people by
suggesting low values of ZONEn-N.  Besides even if someone lives
on the border, then still want to see and bee seen out 2 hops
usually.  Remember, the ZONEn-N system was only intended to
allow LARGE values of N to be used for OCCASSIONAL operation
into specific ZONE wide net, without causing the problems that
using that SAME large N would cause if that border station used
a large WIDEn-N.

Bob, WB4APR



> Dion.
> 
> 
> On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:35:01 +1100, Richard Hoskin 
> <vk3jfk at amsat.org>  
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Dion,
> >
> > If you where using any ZONEn-n / SSn-n path you would need 
> to change it  
> > when
> > you crossed Zone boundaries. This does not apply to the VK3 
> Zone system  
> > as
> > it is transparent to users.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Richard
> > VK3JFK
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au 
> [mailto:ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au] On
> >> Behalf Of Dion Bramich
> >> Sent: Tuesday, 7 November 2006 5:14 PM
> >> To: VK / ZL APRS Users
> >> Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] European v USnewparadigmand
pathlimiting
> >> +confusion....
> >>
> >> On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:58:34 +1100, Andrew McDade  
> >> <amcdade at iprimus.com.au>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Gday Richard and all,
> >> >
> >> >> Zoning would make more sense. We use a different 
> implementation of
> >> Zones
> >> >> in
> >> >> VK3 already
> >> >
> >> > Noting your comment above. I think that we should be
trying to
> >> > standardize
> >> > on one form or another of a zoning system that will best 
> suit the  
> >> whole
> >> > of
> >> > Australia. You could say that each region / zone is 
> independent, and  
> >> so
> >> > it
> >> > doesn't really matter which way this is setup. However 
> it would be  
> >> nice
> >> > from
> >> > a documentation and new user setup point of view, if a 
> standard set of
> >> > guidelines is developed with regards to this.
> >>
> >> Nicer, eg, if someone down here could get on the boat, 
> drive and be seen
> >> without the need for him to take all his documentation to 
> learn how to
> >> reprogram, and his laptop to do the programming?
> >>
> >> >
> >> > BTW... perhaps you could tell us more about the Vic
zoning
> >> > implementation.
> >> > Perhaps , it'll suit the rest of us as well !!.
> >>
> >> Dion.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Regards .. Andrew
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Ozaprs mailing list
> >> > Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
> >> > http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: 
> http://www.opera.com/mail/
> >> Send instant messages to your online friends  
> >> http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ozaprs mailing list
> >> Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
> >> http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ozaprs mailing list
> > Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
> > http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
http://www.opera.com/mail/
> Send instant messages to your online friends 
> http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
> _______________________________________________
> Ozaprs mailing list
> Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
> http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
> 

_______________________________________________
Ozaprs mailing list
Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://second.aprs.net.au/pipermail/ozaprs/attachments/20061108/a378bf4a/attachment.htm