[OZAPRS] VK2RHR-1 raw

[Graeme]

Hi Glen,

Locally there is an intention to install a digi on Mt Bethungra.  A coverage 
map that I generated shows that it will reach Ginini with good signal which 
is expected anyway as my igate hears Ginini yet my igate is further away and 
at a lower altitude.  The coverage map shows that Bethungra will not 
reliably reach the Goulburn area although the criteria was for a a mobile 
antenna so might reach JUZ.  I have no expectation that Bethungra will link 
with RHR.

Graeme
2HFG

-----Original Message----- 
From: Glen English VK1XX
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 3:16 PM
To: ozaprs at aprs.net.au
Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] VK2RHR-1 raw

Hi Graeme .

I disagree. Sydney proper DOES hit RHR on a good number of occasions,
anywhere in the SW, and anywhere in the north that is elevated.  It is
where I grew up.

I've re instated from RHR-1 digi at RGI  for the moment...

However there will be a change when I figure out how , and,
and subject to some testing with older TNCs and gear , in order to
ascertain compatibility and problems,

that RHR will be considered a WIDE2 , and as such will have used up the
WIDE2-1 in the list, and so will be dropped when heard.

Packets with some other address match like SENSW or RVR will be
digipeated... on some format to permit on forwarding , like they might
be digipeated with VK1RGI-1*,SENSW2-1

this means ginini would become a specific link for you guys.  I would
have thought you'd have a path direct to JUZ or RHR from somewhere up
north of Coota ?

good discussion , anyway

back to Python.


:-)

Users will need to reprogram their gear if they
On 15/11/2017 2:43 PM, Graeme wrote:
> Hello Glen,
>
> Sydney proper does not hit RHR - it's mostly only after leaving Sydney
> that RHR comes into play and vehicles travelling south are not
> necessarily heading into Canberra, bypassing Canberra mostly past or
> through the Riverina heading into Victoria or SA, with others heading
> west from Yass. Users wouldn't reconfigure their paths for out of
> Sydney travelling so would remain wide1, wide2-1 then get dropped
> prematurely by RGI after only having been first heard by RHR.
>
> I don't agree with VK2XRX-9>S3T8P9,VK2RHR-1,WIDE1*,WIDE2-1 being
> dropped/ignored by RGI unless all people who might travel out of urban
> areas change to wide1,wide2-2 permanently which I suspect will cause
> far more congestion.
>
> Graeme
> 2HFG
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Glen English VK1XX
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 1:32 PM
> To: ozaprs at aprs.net.au
> Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] VK2RHR-1 raw
>
> Hi Graeme ,
>
> I take ur point. we'll see what overs have to say .
>
> The thing is the SPIRIT of WIDE2-1 in sydney would not include Ginini
> .....
>
> For that, a user could run WIDE2-2
>
> so, if I treat WIDE2-1 out of RHR as a drop  but 22-2 from RHR as a
> pass, that will be fine.
>
> on receipt of this :
> VK2XRX-9>S3T8P9,VK2RHR-1,WIDE1*,WIDE2-1:
>
> RGI should treat as DROP/IGNORE
>
> on receipt of this :
> VK2XRX-9>S3T8P9,VK2RHR-1,WIDE1*,WIDE2-2:
>
> RGI would generate this : (as it considers RHR a WIDE2)
>
> VK2XRX-9>S3T8P9,VK2RHR-1,VK2RGI-1*,
>
> you would get the traffic that way.
>
> comments ?
>
>
> On 15/11/2017 12:59 PM, Graeme wrote:
>> Glen,
>>
>> RHR only draws from south of Sydney from around the
>> Campbelltown/Camden area which is easily a day's return drive that I
>> do myself from the eastern Riverina and therefore of interest to
>> people in the Riverina.  I don't think that RGI should exclude RHR's
>> messages.
>>
>> Graeme
>> 2HFG
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OZAPRS mailing list
> OZAPRS at aprs.net.au
> http://lists.aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
> _______________________________________________
> OZAPRS mailing list
> OZAPRS at aprs.net.au
> http://lists.aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs


_______________________________________________
OZAPRS mailing list
OZAPRS at aprs.net.au
http://lists.aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs