[OZAPRS] Mine's bigger than yours (?)

[Andrew Rich]

I used to use radio mobile 

It was pretty close to real radar 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 3 Aug 2017, at 8:52 am, vk2tv <vk2tv at exemail.com.au> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 02/08/17 19:33, Liz wrote:
>> 
>> We get attenuation from wine tanks to the north, about 10m away.
>> Currently the antenna is about 5m above the roof which is 4m above the
>> ground. The ground is flat for an extended distance. In those
>> directions with no interference / attenuation I can receive from almost
>> 350km away, with the plane at 11000+ metres.
>> The plan is to raise the antenna further, but the coax won't stretch
>> any further.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>> Liz
>> VK2XSE
>> 
> 
> I used to get serious attenuation from wine bottles, and then I stopped drinking!
> 
> Raising the antenna's height might not produce a significant difference in range, it all depends on how close any obstacles are to YOUR end of the radio path. The closer to your end any obstacles are, the greater the height increase you'll need. As per an example for here where my outlook to the east is pretty much unobstructed for most directions, I only stand to gain another 19km (in 460km) by increasing antenna height from 1m to 30m, for an aircraft at about 38,000ft. However, to the west where I look into the crest of a hill just 50ft away, a 15m mast would make one heck of a difference.
> 
> A useful test is to run a path profile program such as SPLAT! in Line Of Site (LOS) mode to reveal just what gets in the way for various antenna heights.
> 
> Here's a useful radar horizon calculator ... http://members.home.nl/7seas/radcalc.htm
> 
> Ray vk2tv
> _______________________________________________
> OZAPRS mailing list
> OZAPRS at aprs.net.au
> http://lists.aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs