[OZAPRS] Exetel

[Damien Gardner Jnr]

Sounds like F6BVP needs to either harass his ISP about updating their bogon
filters, or move to an ISP clueful enough to not be using them in this day
and age..

--DG


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au [mailto:ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au]
> On Behalf Of Mark Cheeseman
> Sent: Monday, 15 November 2010 9:57 PM
> To: ozaprs at aprs.net.au
> Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] Exetel
> 
> >
> > So far it looks like 220.233 are ok and 115.70 are not
> >
> > Ray vk2tv
> 
> Another data point: I am also on Exetel with a 115.70 address. I also have
a
> portable 203.x.x.x class C routed to the same WAN IP.
> 
> Traceroute from the WAN IP dies at the same point that other posters have
> noted; traceroute from an address on my own address block reaches the
> destination.
> 
> Curiously, on two successive traceroutes from the WAN IP, one returned a
> network unreachable, while the other just expired as traceroute does when
> nothing within the TTL range wants to respond.
> 
> Hope this helps
> 
> -Mark VK2XGK
> _______________________________________________
> OZAPRS mailing list
> OZAPRS at aprs.net.au
> http://lists.aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs