[OZAPRS] Higher beacon rate HF versus VHF?
David and Justine Olsen
davejust at bigpond.net.au
Tue Mar 31 08:41:53 EST 2009
Andrew,
Good point, I was of course referring to 40m, when I was suggesting
higher rates and fewer copies. I understand it would be difficult to
have a "standard" that varies for bands, just suggesting that I am
not sure you would get a lot of objections if your home station or
igate beaconed more often than recommended.
David
On 31 Mar 2009, at 07:26, vk5ex.andrew at gmail wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> Re Davids comment below.
>
>> You sure? They can transmit all they like. Given the poor Rx
>> success rate, they aren't going to cause a whole lot of problems
>> if they aren't heard by anyone.
>
> Id just like to clarify that we have a truley excellent access rate
> on 30m nowadays. Looking at past logs for various Northern Flinders
> trips and Innaminka trips Ive done over the past couple of years I
> can say that posit to HF gate success rate would be very very close
> to 100 percent. In fact just looking at one of my last track logs
> on aprs.fi for a Flinders trip we did last month, the tracking was
> excedingly good with only a couple of missed posits. I was running
> a 5 minute beacon rate at about 20 watts on that trip. Probably a
> bit quick for general use on 30m, but it gives a good indication of
> how reliable 30m HF aprs is nowadays.
> So perhaps when we refer to poor RX success rates we need to
> clarify that a bit more as to what bands we're talking about etc. !!
>
> Regards .. Andrew .. VK5EX
> _______________________________________________
> Ozaprs mailing list
> Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
> http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
_______________________________________________
Ozaprs mailing list
Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
More information about the Ozaprs
mailing list