[OZAPRS] European v USnewparadigmand pathlimiting +confusion....

Richard Hoskin vk3jfk at amsat.org
Tue Nov 7 18:41:02 EST 2006


Hi Chris,

I agree, we need to keep it simple for the users.
So all you would need to implement in VK6 would be something like 
Mobile use WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2 and home station use 'Closed Digi',WIDE1-1 or
they could use ZONE2-2 etc. This would follow the basic National Standard
we
are discussing.

I don't think you will have a problem with the low user base over there
and
you probably don't need a zone system at this stage.

Cheers
Richard
VK3JFK

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au [mailto:ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au] On
> Behalf Of Chris Hill
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 November 2006 5:24 PM
> To: 'VK / ZL APRS Users'
> Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] European v USnewparadigmand pathlimiting
> +confusion....
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I think it is _really_ important that we keep it is a simple as possible
> for
> the average user.
> 
> I'm sure there is a need somewhere or other for zoning...  but I can't
see
> a
> pressing need for it in VK6 for many years to come!
> 
> Therefore, what's wrong with telling all mobiles to use a path similar
to:
> 
> APRS v WIDE2-2
> 
> ( or APRS v WIDE3-3).
> 
> 
> "APRS v WIDE4-4" would be fine for VK6...  all we need now is more users
> of
> the system, plus a digipeater to cover to the north of Perth.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
> Chris
> vk6kch
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au [mailto:ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au] On
> Behalf Of Dion Bramich
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 November 2006 2:14 PM
> To: VK / ZL APRS Users
> Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] European v USnewparadigmand pathlimiting
> +confusion....
> 
> On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:58:34 +1100, Andrew McDade
<amcdade at iprimus.com.au>
> wrote:
> 
> > Gday Richard and all,
> >
> >> Zoning would make more sense. We use a different implementation of
> Zones
> >> in
> >> VK3 already
> >
> > Noting your comment above. I think that we should be trying to
> > standardize
> > on one form or another of a zoning system that will best suit the
whole
> > of
> > Australia. You could say that each region / zone is independent, and
so
> > it
> > doesn't really matter which way this is setup. However it would be
nice
> > from
> > a documentation and new user setup point of view, if a standard set of
> > guidelines is developed with regards to this.
> 
> Nicer, eg, if someone down here could get on the boat, drive and be seen
> without the need for him to take all his documentation to learn how to
> reprogram, and his laptop to do the programming?
> 
> >
> > BTW... perhaps you could tell us more about the Vic zoning
> > implementation.
> > Perhaps , it'll suit the rest of us as well !!.
> 
> Dion.
> 
> >
> > Regards .. Andrew
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ozaprs mailing list
> > Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
> > http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
> Send instant messages to your online friends
http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Ozaprs mailing list
> Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
> http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ozaprs mailing list
> Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
> http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs

_______________________________________________
Ozaprs mailing list
Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://second.aprs.net.au/pipermail/ozaprs/attachments/20061107/60136d11/attachment.htm 


More information about the Ozaprs mailing list