<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p><font face="Arial">And how does that solve the basic RF problems
        of tx noise and rx overload for a shared site? </font><br>
    </p>
    Ray vk2tv<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/11/17 14:29, Andrew Rich wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:27880FBC-1F6E-4ED2-BB1F-5D8F332FAEF4@tech-software.net">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      Go 19k2 <br>
      <br>
      <div id="AppleMailSignature">Sent from my iPhone</div>
      <div><br>
        On 15 Nov 2017, at 1:24 pm, Matthew Cook <<a
          href="mailto:vk5zm@bistre.net" moz-do-not-send="true">vk5zm@bistre.net</a>>
        wrote:<br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div>
          <div dir="ltr">As I mentioned not easy, but not impossible
            either :)
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>In liu of going around in circles then the question is
              where to move it that will gain the support of the WIA
              TAC.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>There is no where that I can see within 430-440MHz
              where this could go and co-site happily it's just too
              crowded.... so really the only logical place is where
              you've already suggested between 441.000 & 442.975 in
              the ALL MODE section...  The complication here being it
              won't work well co-sited with a DATV TX and at the other
              end you're up against the top of the repeater links....</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Suggestions ?</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Matthew</div>
            <div>VK5ZM</div>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
            <div class="gmail_quote">On 15 November 2017 at 11:18, Glen
              English VK1XX <span dir="ltr"><<a
                  href="mailto:glenlist@pacificmedia.com.au"
                  target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">glenlist@pacificmedia.com.au</a>></span>
              wrote:<br>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi
                Matthew<br>
                <br>
                You are right about TX combining, but your argument does
                not correctly<br>
                consider TX noise. You will need a cubic meter of
                filters to do it with<br>
                a reasonable loss of  < 3dB....<br>
                <br>
                You have to look at the percentages...<br>
                <br>
                800kHz on 2m (your 145.175 with 1,6meg 2m repester
                offsets )  is OK.<br>
                <br>
                But  800kHz on 2m is NOT 800kHz on UHF, it is 2.4 MHz on
                UHF.<br>
                <br>
                300kHz on UHF  (what you proposed) is  100kHz on 2m.<br>
                <br>
                anyone care to build a 100kHz offset 2m duplexor ?<br>
                <br>
                at 300kHz away on UHF, most radios will be ~ 80dB down
                in a 16kHz<br>
                bandwidth .<br>
                so if we have +43dBm TX, noise is -37dBm.<br>
                <br>
                if we are on the same coax ,  we need the difference of 
                -127 - -37 = 90dB<br>
                <br>
                if we are on a split antenna system (all TX in ANT1, all
                RX in antenna<br>
                2) then the isolation between the two antennas subtracts
                from the filter<br>
                requirement call it 40dB on 70cm, so now you require
                50dB .<br>
                <br>
                300kHz at UHF  is 0.06% frequency spacing. This wont be
                practically<br>
                realisable with a bandpass-notch configuration because
                the return loss<br>
                will suffer. Back to a bandpass configuration, 10dB
                isolation is about<br>
                all you'll get so you'll need 5 x 6" 3/4 wave filters
                for about 7 dB<br>
                loss.  and god awful return loss<br>
                <br>
                For fixing the return loss you could use a balanced
                hybrid combiner, and<br>
                2x the filters, so 10 x 6"  filters and 2 hybrids will
                yield good return<br>
                loss and perhaps 6-7dB loss for your 50dB....<br>
                <br>
                It's clearly not too easy.<br>
                <span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
                    -glen<br>
                  </font></span>
                <div class="HOEnZb">
                  <div class="h5"><br>
                    <br>
                    ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                    OZAPRS mailing list<br>
                    <a href="mailto:OZAPRS@aprs.net.au"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">OZAPRS@aprs.net.au</a><br>
                    <a
                      href="http://lists.aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs"
                      rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.aprs.net.au/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/ozaprs</a><br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
          <span>OZAPRS mailing list</span><br>
          <span><a href="mailto:OZAPRS@aprs.net.au"
              moz-do-not-send="true">OZAPRS@aprs.net.au</a></span><br>
          <span><a
              href="http://lists.aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs"
              moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs</a></span><br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
OZAPRS mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:OZAPRS@aprs.net.au">OZAPRS@aprs.net.au</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs">http://lists.aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>