<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Steve,<br>
<br>
83m is 272 ft, close enough to the 300 I guessed.<br>
<br>
800m is a tad higher than what SPLAT! (and Google earth) thinks it is
but still close enough, especially given the step sizes available for
HAAT and Power.<br>
<br>
HAAT - Height Above Average Terrain<br>
<br>
Pick 0dB gain and the nearest height and you won't be too far off. It's
only a guide.<br>
<br>
Ray vk2tv<br>
<br>
On 10/08/10 09:27, Steve Sharp wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTik-z9X_nHajdV+DQ0q7azq2X8hPeKp-8jrAGPKn@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div>The tech got back to me with the following:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>"Antenna Gain is going to be 3db to start with but then unity
when we get around to putting the 2m repeater up there , HAAT not <br>
sure what it means but antenna hight is 83m above ground or 883m above
sea level"</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Sound about right?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Steve VK2POO<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 10 August 2010 07:48, Ray Wells <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:vk2tv@exemail.com.au">vk2tv@exemail.com.au</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"
class="gmail_quote">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">Hi Steve,<br>
<br>