[OZAPRS] (no subject)

[Matthew Cook]

I was hopeful that this might have gotten legs;

http://open5066.org/wiki/

Combined with an open source STANAG 4539 serial tone modem we'd have seen
speeds unheard of on HF for email retrieval.

However there is still that pesky LCD that we need to comply with regarding
carriage services and the passing of third party traffic, it's part of the
differences between Winlink, Sailmail and Airmail 2000.   One day perhaps.

Having design and constructed HF email networks across most of Africa &
South America I can tell a few stories of how not to do it.

73

Matthew
VK5ZM

On 17 October 2017 at 12:39, Marcus B <mrmabs at gmail.com> wrote:

> Not history, but current, I'm amazed no one brought up Winlink. From my
> very superficial understanding, Winlink is basically an email protocol that
> can basically run on top of any data transport, but the most popular
> transport is newer propriety PACTOR. It does appear that there are some
> out there that are turned off by propriety protocols and run it over more
> open transports. I haven't looked in to it much more than that.
>
> There are people that have set up Winlink to download their own email in
> emergency locations and then they use that to help civilians contact family
> and pass on that they are OK. (As an example use case.)
>
> 73,
> Marcus.
>
> On Mon., 16 Oct. 2017, 23:16 Peter Wicklein, <vk3tbn at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Glen
>>
>>
>>
>> Would recommend looking at the SCS brand of equipment from Germany,
>> latest tech and not just for Robust packet but for hf/VHF APRS/
>> RTTY/AMTOR... etc.. DSP, high speed, you get what you pay for usually.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Pete
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
>> Windows 10
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Glen English VK1XX <glenlist at pacificmedia.com.au>
>> *Sent: *Monday, 16 October 2017 12:23 PM
>> *To: *ozaprs at aprs.net.au
>>
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [OZAPRS] (no subject)
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks everyone for their input. Yes a long time ago since I had a V2
>>
>>
>> protocol vancouver TNC, and microbee...
>>
>> I thought Rose beat Net/Rom ?  I see alot of APRS devices with no
>> receivers, which is not in the spirit of CSMA .... yeah going to get
>> our busy WICEN events in the ACT region back into connected mode packet.
>> Deals with some difficult locations.
>>
>> I've got the makings of a full TNC on a single STM32 micro, all with
>> software modems and direwolf stack. I can run about 5 x independent 1200
>> baud direwolf TNCs on it :-). The direwolf needs some tweaks to have it
>> fast on a smaller footprint platform, but not much.
>>
>> No need to look at any old stuff - I am a ground zero engineer, not a
>> copy and paster.... There is nothing to learn from 15 y low grade tech
>> of the day. However there is much to learn from stuff and techniques in
>> the 1960s that can now be done with modern hardware that is analog
>> stable by means of DSP...
>>
>> Can't believe KPC3+ is still sold. that's a real piece of old
>> technology. That's almost taking buyers for a ride IMO.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OZAPRS mailing list
>> OZAPRS at aprs.net.au
>>
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Flists.aprs.net.au%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%
>> 2Fozaprs&data=02%7C01%7Choppeter2%40hotmail.com%
>> 7Cbd58836812d74d1e5a9008d514348118%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaa
>> aaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636437138097029510&sdata=ybRb9NsHMmuysr0w5W4%2FeX%2F%
>> 2BGGqtZ94Fozd1Zw1MsJ8%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OZAPRS mailing list
>> OZAPRS at aprs.net.au
>> http://lists.aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OZAPRS mailing list
> OZAPRS at aprs.net.au
> http://lists.aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.aprs.net.au/pipermail/ozaprs/attachments/20171017/674eba89/attachment-0001.html>