[OZAPRS] KPC3 dupe question (Scott & Clare Evans)

[Tony Hunt]

Scott thanks for all the replies.. Humans can also figure out the way
around
spelling errors when spell checkers are just gob smacked.. No problem..

Yes Ive seen that web site of Bobs and its spot on..

The KPC3 here is a version 9 which has other issues that need yet another
firmware upgrade to fix em.. Looks like they fixed most of the problems of
8.2 by releasing 8.3 and then did some more changes and released v 9 which
broke more stuff and had to be fixed leading to v9.1 ..
Real silly saga from where I stand..

Tony Hunt VK5AH



> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 12:40:00 +1100
> From: "Scott & Clare Evans" <clareandscott at bigpond.com>
> Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] KPC3 dupe question
> To: "'VK / ZL  APRS Users'" <ozaprs at aprs.net.au>
> Message-ID:
>
<!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAATt1yw8yDZ0CFNbMuWESDW8KAAA
AQ
AAAAKMVuKtxNG0WBh87Ov2xNRwEAAAAA at bigpond.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
> Have a squiz at the following from Bob's website...
>
> http://eng.usna.navy.mil/~bruninga/aprs/kpc3+WIDEn.txt
>
> Then apply your local requirements around this recommendation!
>
> As for the Kam+ what version is it? The version we ran here was
> KAM-57E77265-8.2 and this didn't suffer the dup problem (although I
didn't
> check the KAM's revision number!)
>
> 73 de VK7HSE Scott Evans
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 22:14:55 +1100
> From: Carl Makin <carl at stagecraft.cx>
> Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] I-Gate traffic VK1NPW-1
> To: VK / ZL  APRS Users <ozaprs at aprs.net.au>
> Message-ID: <0B310414-90BE-4445-B852-DF23082DD5D9 at stagecraft.cx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 15/11/2006, at 5:52 PM, Mike Townsend wrote:
>
> > ***************************************************************
> > Extract from VK1KCM message dated Sun, 1 Oct 2006.
>
> Hmmm, I never saw this reply.  I suspect it got nailed by my anti-
> spam weaponry.
>
> > If it is only for the locals on RF is there a possibility that you
> > could
> > shorten your path to reflect this, to just via VK1RGI-1 would be
> > best for me but even if you
> > can manage a one hop reduction to via WIDE2-2 it would be
> > interesting to see how much
> > of a difference
>
> Given the recent somewhat lengthy discussion on this list both Peter
> and I have changed our gates to use a path of "vk1rgi,wide2-2".  I
> hope that helps somewhat.
>
> Carl.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ozaprs mailing list
> Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
> http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
>
>
> End of Ozaprs Digest, Vol 15, Issue 39
> **************************************
>


_______________________________________________
Ozaprs mailing list
Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://second.aprs.net.au/pipermail/ozaprs/attachments/20061117/35286511/attachment.htm