[OZAPRS] European v US newparadigmand pathlimiting +confusion....

Dion Bramich vk7ybi at yahoo.com.au
Thu Nov 2 23:21:35 EST 2006


I'll get it organised for you.

On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 23:19:45 +1100, Chris Hill  
<chris.hill at crhtelnet.com.au> wrote:

> Hi Dion,
>
> Can you give us all some worked examples?
>
> What settings did you use in your TNC for UIFLOOD, etc?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Chris
> vk6kch
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au [mailto:ozaprs-bounces at aprs.net.au] On
> Behalf Of Dion Bramich
> Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2006 10:46 AM
> To: VK / ZL APRS Users
> Subject: Re: [OZAPRS] European v US new paradigmand pathlimiting
> +confusion....
>
> Zone or state based routing needs to be implemented, it should be
> mandatory.  We are using it here, its excellent.  There will be no near
> border confsuion, it'll solve problems.  It could indeed be taken out
> further to major population areas, it allows so much more control over  
> the
> network than other systems proposed.  I really do believe its easier to
> understand than the old RELAY WIDE TRACE arrangement, newcomers would  
> pick
> it up quicker.
>
> Dion.
> VK7YBI.
>
> On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 10:41:59 +1100, Ron Perry <ronk at sunlinux.com.au>  
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 09:32 +1030, Andrew McDade wrote:
>>> Gday all,
>>>
>>> What are the requirements with regards to the number of path hops we
>>> would
>>> require Nationally. I would see this being a bit of a comprise so as
to
>>> maintain a standard.
>>> There is talk about a maximum of two hops .. i.e.. using WIDE2-2 for
>>> home
>>> stations and perhaps WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1 for mobiles.  Will this suffice
>>> for all
>>> of Australia or do we look at 3 hops WIDE3-3 for home stations and
>>> WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2 for mobiles.
>>>
>>> Points taken regarding Not utilizing SSn-n , as Ron mentions, this  
>>> would
>>> certainly be a problem for networks close to state borders etc.
>>>
>>> What about a zone or region based system used in conjunction with the
>>> generic WIDEn-n system. If we want to cellularize the network, if  
>>> indeed
>>> this is what we want to do, then probably the best way to do it would
>>> be to
>>> use a zone or region based system. ie.. Utilize the first 4 letters of
>>> the
>>> major centre containing the regions Igate. ie. ADEL3-3, MILD3-3,
>>> MELB3-3,
>>> HOBA3-3 etc etc. Home stations , digipeaters and mobiles that don't
>>> frequently travel out of the region would ( could ) utilize the path
>>> ZONE3-3. Mobiles and portable stations that are traveling nation wide
>>> could
>>> use the generic path of WIDE3-3 or WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2. New aprs users,
>>> utilizing information gleaned from the net etc. would probably utilize
>>> WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2 or WIDE3-3 which would work anywhere  all of the time.
>>> The
>>> zonen-n based paths could be gradually implemented within each region
>>> and
>>> would probably be utilized initially by more established aprs users.
>>>
>> Maybe the Zone based system could also be not "mandatory", and
>> implemented as time and regional activity needed.
>>
>>> Its something to have a think about anyway
>>>
>>
>> Well worth thinking about.  I like it.
>>
>> And the bike (VK3ECV-9) will be out and about from Friday until
Tuesday.
>> Marlene and I are spending 4 nights at Mt Beauty.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ron
>> vk3ecv
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ozaprs mailing list
>> Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
>> http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
>>
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
Ozaprs mailing list
Ozaprs at aprs.net.au
http://aprs.net.au/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://second.aprs.net.au/pipermail/ozaprs/attachments/20061102/649f5783/attachment.htm 


More information about the Ozaprs mailing list