[OZAPRS] Help is there, if wanted

[Bob Bruninga]

On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Warren VK3BYD wrote:

> Why don't you use the standard alias of ECHO instead of TUNE ?
> That would then conform to the aprs spec, thus allowing any station to
test
> its performance with out the need to know what each gateway has
programmed
> as aliases.

Because ONLY the TUNE stations are trusted agents who serve as the
"standard" for the channel.  Walking into a room full of HAMS with
everyone being equal and asking WHO IS RIGHT accomplishes nothing (ECHO).

de WB4APR, Bob

>
> Cheers > Warren.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ozaprs mailing list
> ozaprs at marconi.ics.mq.edu.au
> http://marconi.ics.mq.edu.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs
>

de WB4APR at amsat.org, Bob

PCsat WEB  page     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/pcsat.html
ISS-APRS FAQ:       http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/iss-faq.html
CUBESAT Designs     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/cubesat.html
APRS LIVE pages     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs.html
APRS SATELLITES     http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/astars.html
MIM/Mic-E/Mic-Lite  http://ssdl.stanford.edu/mims/

_______________________________________________
ozaprs mailing list
ozaprs at marconi.ics.mq.edu.au
http://marconi.ics.mq.edu.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ozaprs